“A brave white man like you might be just what we need to put an end to this political correctness in America today.” – Kamau Bakari to Cliven Bundy
If you don’t believe there should be a cap on profits then why should there be a cap on wages?
According to your logic, and if ideological consistency is important to you, there should be no such thing as a MINIMUM WAGE.
Wouldn’t a minimum wage be UN-AMERICAN?
Forget adjusting worker wages to inflation or worker productivity, that doesn’t represent true conservative principles.
If a rising tide truly raises all boats and wealth “trickles down,” if wages had grown at the same rate as the earnings of the top 1% of Americans the federal wage floor would be more than triple the current hourly minimum wage.
So…what’s the problem or issue with that?
I’m pragmatic when it comes to nationalism and nationhood. When it comes to Black Afrikan nationhood I’m not thinking about creating a private social club or a clique. I’m thinking of creating a country that can compete on the world stage. For example, lets look at what is working and successful in this world currently:
The 15 Countries With The Highest Quality Of Life
Top 10 World’s Best Countries To Live In 2014
Top 10 Richest Countries in the World 2013
The World’s Most Reputable Countries
Now compare that to these lists:
Top 10 Poorest Countries In The World 2013
The 10 Worst Countries For Human Rights
Corruption: The World’s Top 10 Best And Worst Countries
I feel it is logical, rational, and reasonable, to use models of success rather than failed models or theoretical ones. I’m all for creating a new Black Afrikan paradigm, but…if that is the case that new paradigm should be created on a small level to serve as a prototype of a model that can be expanded on once it has been proven successful.
So, please, don’t come at me with a bunch of rhetoric, hyperbole and doublespeak about metaphysics, celestial waters, the sun, the moon and the stars, resulting in nothingness. Unless you can provide a working model in these days and in these times that can compete and thrive on the world stage then you are just verbally and mentally masturbating.
Just had to get that off my chest. Thank you for indulging me.
“While I am not happy about what happened to Trayvon Martin and his family, it has exposed the lie of this “post racial society” that we claim to live in. I just want you to know, I saw it all. I saw the Facebook posts, tweets, and YouTube videos where you took joy in Trayvon being dead, and gave Zimmerman your moral and financial support.
I saw the games you created on I Tunes and Google play to make Trayvon look like a murdering monster.
I saw all that nonsense over the year and rest assured I took into account who was doing it.
So now when you come begging me for my vote,
when you ask me to help you with your immigration reform,
when you ask me to help me push your book or merchandise,
when you ask me to stand with you so that you can get a law passed to get married,
I saw what you did to Trayvon.
I am not the only one who saw it and…
I won’t forget.”
– Chris Miller
Repugnantan Conservatard Allen West tweets this little gem..
“We were bored & decided to kill somebody.” 3 black teens shoot white jogger.Who will POTUS identify w/this time? http://bit.ly/14SHmcq
FYI: POTUS means President of the United States.
This is the story he is referring to:
2 teens charged with murdering Australian baseball player just because they were “bored”
I’ll destroy this in sequential order.
#1. 2 Black teens and 1 White teen. White teen says in an open court, “I pulled the trigger.”
“A third, age 17, was accused of being an accessory after the fact and with driving a vehicle while a weapon was discharged. He said in open court “I pulled the trigger,” but the judge directed him to remain quiet and said Tuesday was not the day to discuss the facts of the case.” – Source: The Daily News
There goes that reverse racism angle. NEXT.
#2. Both Black people & White people UNIVERSALLY condemn ALL THREE TEENS.
Most civilized and rational people don’t endorse killing people who are not aggressing against you and just minding their own business. If Conservatards and Repugnantans are going to draw a Trayvon Martin similarity to this case the only common thread would be just that. An unarmed innocent person, minding their own business, was shot and killed by an armed person. Do they really want to go down that slippery slope since their main talking point is that George Zimmerman was the victim? NEXT.
#3. What exactly would POTUS identify with?
“I remember that time I went jogging and these teenagers shot and killed me(?)” Huh? The reason POTUS touched on the Trayvon Martin issue in the first place is because he is a Black man in America and as one has been racially profiled and followed simply by virtue of him being Black. He can also provide some insight into why the Black community is particularly sensitive to issues involving racial profiling and discrimination. To my knowledge POTUS is not White, if he was you wouldn’t have a problem with him, and has not been shot and killed. So…what exactly would he be identifying with or providing insight into the white community on other than what 99% of both Black & White people say? Both Black & White people say this was a horrendous crime and all parties involved should go to JAIL. NEXT.
#4. What is the parallel you are attempting to draw with this case to the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case?
“It is an outrage those three teens that shot that man are still free and haven’t been arrested!”
(Oh wait…they were arrested immediately)
“Can you believe how Black people are celebrating the man’s death and calling his killers heroes?”
(Oh wait, I can’t find evidence of ONE Black person applauding the death of the man or calling his killers heroes.)
“Where are Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson?”
(Oh wait…when they came out for Trayvon Martin I called them race baiters and told them to go away. Oops)
“How in God’s name could they have given the gun those teens used to kill that man back to them?”
(Oh wait…that didn’t happen. Ummm…Uhhh…move along now….nothing to see here.)
How do you “religiously” or “spiritually” establish an infrastructure? Which position should you be praying in and what direction should your body be positioned in order to do so? What is the proper name of the deity that needs to be uttered in order for you to establish one?
Thank you in advance for your reply.
Infrastructure is basic physical and organizational structures needed for the operation of a society or enterprise, or the services and facilities necessary for an economy to function.
It can be generally defined as the set of interconnected structural elements that provide framework supporting an entire structure of development. It is an important term for judging a country or region’s development.
The term typically refers to the technical structures that support a society, such as roads, bridges, water supply, sewers, electrical grids, telecommunications, and so forth, and can be defined as “the physical components of interrelated systems providing commodities and services essential to enable, sustain, or enhance societal living conditions.
Viewed functionally, infrastructure facilitates the production of goods and services, and also the distribution of finished products to markets, as well as basic social services such as schools and hospitals; for example, roads enable the transport of raw materials to a factory. In military parlance, the term refers to the buildings and permanent installations necessary for the support, redeployment, and operation of military forces.
To make it simple, infrastructure is anything that is needed everyday, an everyday item.
1. An underlying base or foundation especially for an organization or system.
2. The basic facilities, services, and installations needed for the functioning of a community or society, such as transportation and communications systems, water and power lines, and public institutions including schools, post offices, and prisons.
1: the underlying foundation or basic framework (as of a system or organization)
2: the permanent installations required for military purposes
3: the system of public works of a country, state, or region; also : the resources (as personnel, buildings, or equipment) required for an activity
1. the basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organization.
2. the fundamental facilities and systems serving a country, city, or area, as transportation and communication systems, power plants, and schools.
3. the military installations of a country.
“Hard” versus “soft” infrastructure
“Hard” infrastructure refers to the large physical networks necessary for the functioning of a modern industrial nation.
“Soft” infrastructure refers to all the institutions which are required to maintain the economic, health, and cultural and social standards of a country, such as the financial system, the education system, the health care system, the system of government, and law enforcement, as well as emergency services.
Written by Marc Stevens
I’ve mentioned on the radio show a few times about sending the IRS and other tax agencies affidavits. The affidavits state we are terrified of the IRS and only file returns and report financial transactions out of terror of being attacked, put in jail and having all our property stolen. I’m encouraging everyone, if you file or report to the IRS and other tax agencies, send an affidavit of fear with the return. Let them know you are only complying out of a sense of terror, not because you think there is a legitimate obligation. You may comply, but you will not conceal the threats and coercion they used to get compliance. We will not help them make it look legitimate.
There are several reasons for this, and you’ll see it’s another tool to help bring about a voluntary society, building the free market.
It makes the bureaucrats aware of the violence. I’m convinced, from years of personal experience with tax agents and other bureaucrats, the violent nature of government is very uncomfortable to them. They think they’re the good guys and they have told me they “take offense” when I point out governments have no voluntary support, it’s all compulsory. I have to tell them if it’s really offensive, then do something to change it; quit and offer your services to the market on a voluntary basis: but throw a few thousand assessments out first.
Imagine when there are thousands, perhaps millions of people sending a copy of the affidavit of fear with every return and financial report sent to the IRS and other tax agencies. Think of the impact when they start telling friends and family about these affidavits they are getting with returns and other payments.
There is a real issue of admissibility. I’ve had tax attorneys admit any information/testimony given under threat, duress and coercion is inadmissible. Yes, they play desperate word games in a silly attempt to convince the gullible it’s not really threat, duress and coercion when you use the word government; we know better. We know people are coerced to pay taxes and file returns and reports such as 1099’s; we also know there is a very real threat of jail for non-compliance:
Rational people aren’t fooled; facts are very stubborn things. Governments don’t ask for support, they demand it and are very willing to attack people and forcibly take their property if they don’t get compliance. People are terrified of the IRS: I had a Ms. Little, an IRS agent in Austin, Texas, tell me on April 7, 2011, that she was afraid of the IRS. Ms. Little told me when she gets a letter from the IRS she gets “flushed” and fearful. Anyone who tells you they are not afraid of the IRS is probably lying to you.
The IRS relies on us to send them reports so they can attack us. Problem is, coerced testimony is usually considered inadmissible, at least to those of us interested in truth and justice. That’s looks like a pretty big fly in the ointment to me. If they’re going to use threats, duress and coercion instead of providing a service we are wiling to voluntarily pay for, then we’re not going to hide that fact. Let’s make sure the violence – our only real problem with the idea of government – is never ignored and is always center stage. It undermines everything they are trying to put over on us, such as protecting us and that we are obligated to pay taxes. Yes, pay or go to jail: sounds like great protection, no wonder they have no voluntary support.
We should also be doing this for business and driver’s licenses; any time we are coerced to pay something, we should include the affidavit of fear. I prefer to see more people trading freely, that is, without licenses and taxes. But, if you are afraid of retaliation from those called government if you were to trade freely with others, then let them know when you get that business license it is out of fear. Let’s send so many they cannot ignore it and will see the futility in trying to spin it. Remember, no one can testify to your mental state, your perceptions, even they know that. We are not lying when we testify we are afraid of people like the IRS.
I’ve got two templates you can use and edit appropriately template 1, template 2. Have it notarized and make up a few dozen copies and keep in mind we don’t have to just send them to tax agencies, it’s appropriate to send to politicians, such as governors and mayors. Let them know you only pay their salary out of fear of being attacked. They are people like us, only they may not recognize the true violent nature of their support. Let’s help them see behind the PR and distractions such as elections. Let’s help them see the truth.
It’s got to be difficult to continue doing a job when your pretended customers keep filing affidavits they are only complying out of fear. If we’re going to continue to comply out of fear, we may as well let them know. Why make farming us any easier for them?
I’ve added a new Yelp review widget on the sidebar of my website. Now you can get my views and opinions on restaurants and stores. This may be of relevance to you if you are a foodie like me and you reside in the New York City area. Enjoy!